LCMS New Jersey District
  • Home
    • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • Administration
    • Board of Directors
    • Find a LCMS Church or School Near You >
      • NJ District Congregations
      • NJ District Schools
      • Find an LCMS Church, School, or Rostered Worker
    • Contact
  • EVENTS
    • Fall Pastors Conference
    • Calendar
    • Spring Pastor's Conference
    • Mission Classic Golf Outing
  • SERVICES
    • Congregational Services >
      • District Communications >
        • Communications Blog
      • Lutheran Schools & Early Childhood Centers
      • Parish Nursing
      • Worker Wellness >
        • Wellness Blog
    • Outreach & Missions >
      • Adult Ministry
      • Disaster Response
      • Stewardship & Financial Support Services
      • Lily the Comfort Dog
      • Mission and Ministry to Military, Veterans and Their Families
    • Partners in Ministry
  • AID & GRANTS
    • Financial Aid for LCMS Students
    • CHEF Grants
  • RESOURCES
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Curated Articles & Papers
    • Resources on Racism
    • Recorded Workshops
    • Legal Resources
    • District Documents
    • Resources for Clergy >
      • District Directory
      • In Commemoration of the Reformation
      • 2020 Winter Pastors Conference Presentation Slides
      • Leaders & Learners
    • Resources for Congregations >
      • Congregations & Workers
    • District Convention 2018 >
      • Reports
  • DISTRICT CONVENTION
    • 2021 NJ District Convention Updates
    • Convention Information
    • Reports to the 2021 District Convention
    • Essayists
  • BLOG
    • Health Blog
  • Give

IN commemoration of THE REFORMATION

On the Sacrament of Penance (August 1519)

10/8/2019

6 Comments

 
By: Rick Serina
Picture
     This is the second in a monthly series of articles requested by the New Jersey District President which commemorate anniversaries of particular writings or events in the life of Martin Luther. They are intended to introduce the historical background and theological content and implications of those writings or events, as well as raise questions about how they might pertain to consciously Lutheran parish ministry in twenty-first-century America. The purpose is not to provide answers to these difficult questions, but to provoke reflection, personally or jointly, on how Luther’s life and thought relates to the challenges facing us. 

     If there were a “white-hot” center to Martin Luther’s Reformation, it would have to be his understanding of penance. The famous Ninety-Five Theses began with a statement about penance: “When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, ‘Repent’ (Mt 4:17), he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.” He then followed it by distinguishing between the sacrament of penance—what we call confession and absolution—and the internal repentance by which we acknowledge ourselves to be sinners. St. Jerome’s translation of repentance in Latin was poenitentiam agite (to “make” or “do” penance) and this gave rise to the notion that repentance meant going through a procession of penance. Luther, though, took the Greek word metanoia to mean a literal, internal conversion, where the sinner reflected upon his sins and turned to God in faith, seeking salvation. The entire medieval penitential system Luther opposed in October 1517, including the sale of indulgences, derived from this understanding of penance as a process one “did” rather than as a repentance from sin that led to the embrace of the gospel in faith. 

     When he published his theses in 1517, however, Luther hadn’t quite developed the clear understanding of justification by faith we have come to expect from him. That can be seen more clearly in his August 1519 sermon “On the Sacrament of Penance.” These sermons were not necessarily preached (though they may have been prior to publication), but they were “circular” sermons printed and distributed widely in the vernacular German for people with lesser theological knowledge to read and understand—not to mention those who didn’t know Latin. In this particular sermon, Luther took aim at the medieval understanding of the sacrament of penance, which was divided into three distinct parts: contrition, confession, and satisfaction. Contrition was the motivation for going to confession, and that could either be legitimate contrition (a legitimate sorrow for one’s sin out of love for God) or attrition (driven only to confess out of fear of punishment). Confession proper was the act of auricular confession, mandated once a year by the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and requiring the precise enumeration of all sins committed that required forgiveness. Satisfaction then entailed specific acts prescribed by the confessor to the penitent, upon completion of which those sins enumerated in confession were absolved. 

     The entire structure of the penitential system raised one obvious question: How do I know my sins are forgiven? One could go through all the steps, yet still wonder whether there was true contrition or simply attrition, whether all sins needing absolution were accurately enumerated, and whether acts of satisfaction had been completed sufficiently. Many scholars—even Luther himself—have argued that this created a torture of consciences, but this may be a little overstated. Records show that medieval confessors tried their best to care for penitents and took great pains to provide them pastoral direction, and that resources were published for the training of confessors and for their use in the sacrament of penance. Nevertheless, there remained a degree of uncertainty, and that uncertainty owed to a misunderstanding of justification by faith and how absolution should provide the forgiveness one receives in faith.

     In response to this, Luther’s sermon delineated three different parts of penance (not the two we are accustomed to from later confessional writings). The first was the Word of absolution, where the priest speaks the word of forgiveness to the penitent confessing his sins: Ego te absolvo—“I forgive you.” The second part related to the faith of the penitent receiving the absolution. We are most familiar with this from the Lutheran confessions, but it was something medieval penance simply did not include because medieval theologians operated with a different functional definition of faith, more like cognitive assent than genuine trust in the promises of Christ, as Luther taught it according to St. Paul. The peace and forgiveness that followed faith in the absolution rounded out the three parts of penance for Luther. This means just what it sounds like: rather than a sense of uncertainty, the penitent believer walks away from the sacrament of penance confident that his sins are forgiven because of Christ and that peace with God has been restored. The famous Tübingen Luther scholar Oswald Bayer has made the well-accepted point that with this new 1519 understanding, Luther had come to his “Reformation breakthrough”: he realized that salvation could not be attained through works of the law, but solely by faith in the Word proclaimed, and he came to this realization nowhere more clearly than in the sacrament of penance. When the priest pronounced absolution, the penitent could receive it in certainty and confidence, knowing that what is spoken there on earth is reflected in heaven before God. 

     But this argument doesn’t necessarily address the problem we face today. We aren’t reforming a misleading view of penance, absolution, and faith; we are dealing with a more daunting challenge: What happens to absolution when the people receiving absolution don’t believe they need it? To put it differently, how do we communicate the need for and benefits of absolution in a culture that doesn’t legitimately believe in personal sin? In the Middle Ages and in the days of the early Reformation, even if the case is overstated, the people genuinely feared death, punishment for sin, and an eternal hell as the fate that awaited them apart from the mercy of Christ. But what does it make of our absolutions when, in fact, those conditions no longer exist? Nothing in our culture, nothing in American Christianity, nothing in the daily lives of our parishioners speaks of sin as it was traditionally understood. At most, we hear of sin as social ills (and which social ills all depends upon whether you vote red or blue). But personal culpability for sins one has committed, by commission or omission, by things we have done or not done? That is a tough sell. It also leaves us with a pastoral predicament as Lutherans: How should we catechize our people in sin so that they might understand and embrace the absolution offered in response to their confessions? While penance provided Luther an opportunity to teach about justification by faith, it now requires us to address a different topic altogether: the nature, consequence, and need for forgiveness of sins. How we do that may be one of the most pressing issues of our pastoral ministries.
6 Comments
Paul Sparling
10/10/2019 05:18:35 pm

You article was not only informative but challenging. Since we are "justified by faith", we are forgiven of all sin, past, immediate and future. But what do we do? Paul's advice to the Philipian jailer was "Believe." This re-directs us to faith in the work of the Savior but what do we do? Luther explains in the 2nd article, "... thank and praise, serve and obey." The sense of "obligation" and its impending punishment for sin is removed, permanently. Now we are free to "serve and obey" without measurement or impending doom. I like to put it like "do your best." Today, we have been challenged to "do our best" but with the sense of reward or condemnation. Remove the threat of "doom" or that of "reward" and we are re-directed to faith in the Savior and what He has done for us. Sorry to be so "long winded" but I am a "preacher." Paul

Reply
Rick Serina
11/13/2019 03:06:24 pm

Thanks, Paul. Yes, as Luther and the Luther Confessions (let alone your namesake, St. Paul!) point out, good works follow from faith. They are not something we must do in order to be justified--and that is the fundamental point of Luther's Pauline understanding of the gospel. As one Lutheran theologian put it well, good works are not something we *have* to do; they are something we *get* to do.

Reply
Bill Moller link
10/18/2019 09:51:26 pm

I was struck by the line "What happens to absolution when the people receiving absolution don’t believe they need it?" It reminded me of a comment by a young member of our church, "It's not my fault Eve was a jerk." Her statement casts doubt on the inherited affects of original sin. Rev. Serina's question is a universal one - we all tend to think OUR actions are just, and therefore require no forgiveness. I often squirm in my pew when I read all the "dirty rotten sinner" lines in our Service Book. In my mind I understand the accusation, but still I feel judged – and from a theological perspective rightly so. However, as is true in most situations, the issue doesn’t play out so cut and dry. I know in my heart and from Scripture that God wants the best for me – that fact is easy to defend. Yes, it's true that I didn't eat the fruit that Eve ate (and feel I shouldn't pay a price for her sin), but I also know that for some strange reason I often fail to respect God's desires. In my own way I take a little bite of that ancient fruit daily. Maybe if we in the church tone down the broad "poor, miserable sinner" rhetoric and refocus on the day-to-day ways we stomp all over God's desires for us, we might gain some credibility with Gens X & Z.

Reply
Rick Serina
11/13/2019 03:13:56 pm

Thanks, Bill. The question of how we should articulate sin to different generations gets complex. I do find it interesting the way original sin and actual sins are related in Luther's catechisms: our inability to fear, love, and trust in God (first commandment) reveals so clearly why we cannot "fear and love God so that we do not [insert any other commandment!]". It is also worth nothing the parallel between the Augsburg Confession's definition of original sin in AC 2 ("without fear of God, without trust in God, with concupiscence") equates so closely with the explanation to the first commandment (fear, trust, and concupiscence as the opposite of love). Inherited sin is at the root of all other sins.

Reply
Robert Dun
2/22/2020 10:15:30 pm

This is really good Rick. Thank you for your post. I'm leading a study at our church (a Bapstist church) on the Augsberg Confession, and I ran across your post - and I'm glad to have done so!

Reply
Myla Reid link
5/20/2022 09:14:38 am

Thaank you for writing this

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Contact Us: 908-233-8111
© 2015-2019 LCMS New Jersey District. All rights reserved.
​

  • Home
    • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • Administration
    • Board of Directors
    • Find a LCMS Church or School Near You >
      • NJ District Congregations
      • NJ District Schools
      • Find an LCMS Church, School, or Rostered Worker
    • Contact
  • EVENTS
    • Fall Pastors Conference
    • Calendar
    • Spring Pastor's Conference
    • Mission Classic Golf Outing
  • SERVICES
    • Congregational Services >
      • District Communications >
        • Communications Blog
      • Lutheran Schools & Early Childhood Centers
      • Parish Nursing
      • Worker Wellness >
        • Wellness Blog
    • Outreach & Missions >
      • Adult Ministry
      • Disaster Response
      • Stewardship & Financial Support Services
      • Lily the Comfort Dog
      • Mission and Ministry to Military, Veterans and Their Families
    • Partners in Ministry
  • AID & GRANTS
    • Financial Aid for LCMS Students
    • CHEF Grants
  • RESOURCES
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Curated Articles & Papers
    • Resources on Racism
    • Recorded Workshops
    • Legal Resources
    • District Documents
    • Resources for Clergy >
      • District Directory
      • In Commemoration of the Reformation
      • 2020 Winter Pastors Conference Presentation Slides
      • Leaders & Learners
    • Resources for Congregations >
      • Congregations & Workers
    • District Convention 2018 >
      • Reports
  • DISTRICT CONVENTION
    • 2021 NJ District Convention Updates
    • Convention Information
    • Reports to the 2021 District Convention
    • Essayists
  • BLOG
    • Health Blog
  • Give